{"by":"nerdfiles","dead":true,"id":5575912,"parent":5575144,"text":"Troll banned, right? Or \"hell-banned\" is it?

Either way. You're completely missing the point. First off \"insane\" is a completely non-precise term, and I strongly believe a clarification of psychological framework be made before the discussion actually begins. Let's stop wasting time on this. Let's stop throwing around \"type\" systems in CS but not in Psych, which are both supposed to be sciences.

I sent this to some developer (acting as a recruiter) for a prominent SF company during a bar run (he was looking for front-end devs not with 10+ startups under their belt but with someone they're looking to mold):

The Web is a hypermedia application. So we're building pretty much http://schema.org/ vocabularies implemented over models (Django, Rails, etc.) with hypermedia specs (front-end begging for more data in more stupid ways than anyone cares to document).

Look. You want kids who'll acclimate better than the Chinese or Russians to text editors like LightTable and who enjoy the pleasures of vim-seek.

And you want an actual Web, or at least people who have dreams which logically entail that such a thing is possible (dreams of mundane facts).

So what am I getting at? What are you dreams restricted by? Is it this or that job? What are you building? What am I building? And what why does it seem that we should be building these things, by our evolution? Demanding high-pay? Insane? What are you talking about? \"High-pay\"? \"Insane\"?

What does any of this have to do with the Internet Declaration of Independence? Why are you inheriting this psychological framework? Why haven't you consumed post-structuralism? Why is your Internet \"American\"?

Again: \"Insane\"?

That's in your headline. In your headline. Headline. That's significant weight.","time":1366369080,"type":"comment"}