nemonemo

Nobody on the outside knows for sure, but two key signals to watch are project sunsets and brain drain.

If the rumors of fundraising difficulties are true, OAI will have to prioritize its most profitable projects, potentially slowing down new training runs and optimizing existing models for efficiency at the expense of user experience.

Insiders are also the first to sense internal trouble, so if top talent starts leaving for competitors preparing to go public, it won't bode well for the company.

No, they sell different products in the same category. You are basically saying Google and Bing as the same product when Bing is superior to Google search in some non-critical metrics.

It does not seem as bad as it sounds like. The numbers are quarter-by-quarter and the market is fluctuating day-by-day basis. To me, growing in this fierce market by 45% qoq seems amazing by itself.

Scientists choose language very carefully. This TLDR is a good example of ruining that effort.

If one eats less, perhaps that alone could lead to hair loss.

What are the real reasons you think?

Why does this sound very much like the argument toward full self-driving? If drivers need to be watchful of mostly autonomous ones, they get bored and lose attention or sometimes take nap in front of the steering wheel. Waymo came out of an extension of this argument..

Maybe this could be used to track how some spoken language changes over time in a region or across regions.

Isn't this basically the mythical man-months LLM edition?

What do you think EB visas are: immigrant visas or work visas? Answer: they are both.

Isn't a literal "moat" about temporary deterrence? I can imagine makeshift bridges could permanently make the moat useless.

Maybe in 10 years when the tech matures, but IMO now seems a bit too early to have a tech like this. It is like intelligence without evolution or progress.. yes it can be used in some niche markets, but difficult to be generic.

Just like any useful tools, there would be an expert super tool user who could probably generate enough profit based on the tools. The majority would not profit from it in the long run (the monopolistic tool makers would reap any profit from the value chain.)

Not sure what you mean by "it", but the doubled usage would be 18h a day.

Yes, it overlaps well with the market open time. But I thought Claude was good with coding... Does this mean major trading agents write code using Claude to make trading decisions? Or Claude models are relatively better than other models in non-coding trading work?