nekoashide

I explained in another thread, but yeah, it acts on my behalf using my access to take actions with my approval. It has knowledge of all my work and leverages various data sources, (Jira, Confluence various mcp's) to gather information and take actions. If I ever have to correct it, or if the actions it takes are going down the wrong path I make sure and understand why and correct that.

It just got really good over time, especially as new processes get brought it and things change. I can't keep up with that like that AI can, just have it review and go down the path of ensuring that it fit's in my workflow as efficiently as possible and move on.

As far as the developer? I gave him ideas but he's on another team and I got my own guys to feed.

If only it was that easy, we are gated behind controls and processes that consume a significant amount of time between finding the bug, and a production push. AI quite literally automates the stuff I don't want to do, like create a fill out a jira ticket in the exact way that team wants it.

I don't have time for that, and neither do the teams that consume these request. As time has gone on me and the other teams I work with are no longer touching code, the AI will follow processes and procedures that pre date AI just fine with some human reviewing and approving.

AI has turned what was weeks at minimum to get a bug fix out, to just doing it all with with some human gating. It's not been a smooth process but watching it play out in real time it's getting faster, more efficient, and less prone to problems.

And that the crux off the situation, patching and securing configurations need to be done much faster than today, project glasswing has shown us that AI can scale to identify and solve those problems faster than a human.

To be clear, that one shot prompt was supported by nearly a years worth of work around developing an enviroment that allows me that level of effortless automation.

The issues was really simple, I knew the application, I knew what the bug was and already had a workaround in my head. I simply stopped at going down that rabbit hole and told claude to deal.

It identified the issue quickly, found the workaround and made the developer aware. All those things I would have done I just watched it do for me, plus, the app is vibe coded anyways, I just need it fixed and regardless of the AI path it was faster shooting out the bug report. Which, was simply poor processing of a spreadsheet.

In my experience at a large bank with unlimited AI, my spend is in the top 5% and I'm leveraging AI just like you.

I was in a meeting with someone who had a bug in an application that I don't own myself on Friday so I told claude,

"I need you to find this bug the user is experiencing, find out if it's user error or a bug, let the user know and tell the developer what needs to be fixed if needed"

15 minutes later the developer ask me if I want it fixed today or Tuesday.

That user could have done the same thing as me, had access to all the same systems and tools as I have, and also received the same AI training I had. The difference is that some users are just not, for lack of better words, AI native.

Ghostbusters on the NES was fear inducing as an 80's kid, then came Resident Evil on the PSX.

Oh I'm sure, the ACM UI was impossible to use for years to find certificates, they improved it, but, it will never have the same level of functionality that the API gives you and that's the bread and butter.

Every morning and evening I watch the sun shine through empty office buildings that were just recently completed. I'm not sure how economical it is to keep the lights on.

Time served, look at how he's been treated, the dude isn't worth any more effort to prosecute. Doing so would look incredibly bad at this point.

This has been causing a number of issues with proxys, we use nginx and we have started to see problems with chrome users and handshakes not working properly.

I think it's key here that if someone else trained the voice and sounded like Scarlett Johansson, and there a payment to that person, and that person exist, it feels like to me they won't have a strong case.

Now if it was trained on the voices from various IP? Or "Computer generated", I think we have an argument that it was trained on her voice.

You see the same with Dentist, the cost to start a practice after paying for college? Or get a job at a big PE owned Dentist Office and work for commission.

Large scale solar farms use larger panels and less protective glass. In one of the articles I read someone nearby had a roof ripped off and also got large hail.

My wife, me on the other hand? I don't use it

Any time I hear "Apache Foundation" my stomach turns as I hesitate to ask my next question. "What we are trying to use from them is built on Java right"

The cool thing about batteries is that they are great as an investment. You can charge them when power is cheap and sell back power when you have high demand and market prices for power.

Typically Peaker Plants fill this role but at much higher cost for electricity and emissions. Batteries just make much more sense for this kind of power.