Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
yeah, and as far as I'm aware there isn't even a definition of "civilization" or "intelligence" that doesn't boil down to "sufficiently like me".
Comment · 2 years ago
I don't entirely disagree with you, but "what products do people want" is overly conservative. Pre-ChatGPT, very few people wanted a (more or less) general purpose chatbot.
Comment · 2 years ago
It's branding (see: TensorFlow); also, pretty much anything (linear) you would do with an arbitrarily ranked tensor can be expressed in terms of vector ops and matmuls
Comment · 2 years ago
cosine similarity is (isomorphic to) "distances to nearby objects". and not all embeddings are word embeddings.
Comment · 2 years ago
If you need to relearn your iPhone/Mac interfaces every year, you might want to get screened for Alzheimers.
Comment · 2 years ago
> Who doesn’t think China has a ten year AI algorithm to takeover Taiwan?

anybody who works in either AI or natsec

Comment · 2 years ago
> We arent going to see more progress until we have a way to generalize the compute graph as a learnable parameter

That's a bold statement since a ton of progress has been made without learning the compute graph.

Comment · 2 years ago
which laws are broken exactly? it's not remotely settled law that "training an NN = copyright infringement"
Comment · 2 years ago
What's an order of magnitude between friends?
Comment · 3 years ago
Maybe "best word processor for mac" is a better search for you?
Comment · 3 years ago
LLMs are trained in parallel. The model weights and optimizer state are split over a number (possibly thousands) of accelerators.

The main bottleneck to doing distributed training like this is the communication between nodes.

Comment · 3 years ago
which jargon here is "just for show"?
Comment · 3 years ago
>it's actually impossible to have a non-Hermitian matrix C such that x†Cx > 0

Nice catch, it's been a few years since I had to think about these details.

Comment · 3 years ago
no, at least not for anything non-contrived.
Comment · 3 years ago
I used Bayesian analysis for an industry problem where we had a lot of data (~1M samples), but the relationship between the observed data and the latent variables of interest was complicated and non-identifiable. In the non-identifiable setting, point estimates don't converge in the large data limit and quantifying uncetainty becomes critical.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton