necklesspen

Depends on your definition of more.

You can absolutely find non-performative posts on Instagram. There is value in a sincere post - ex. sharing pictures of your cat to your friends.

Whereas in LinkedIn no such value exists in my experience - I can't imagine myself posting there for any other reason than to be performative.

So in terms of % of posts being performative I don't think anything tops LinkedIn.

It's a truly wonderful read, made better by the fact the author doesn't quite understand what's going on.

The usual format that fun mathematics is presented (being talked at by someone who is very well versed in the subject) comes with a heavy cognitive burden - and often I just can't really make it through.

When the author is not an expert the writing is just so much more accessible - it's easier to understand and making it through feels more of an adventure and less of a lecture.

I've never thought previously how much I would enjoy this format though. I'm here to see more amateurs stumbling through mathematics.

Also, wasn't expecting this sort of side-quest from the guy who got me into React.

LLMs are tools. The responsibility lies in the human(s) using the tool to act accordingly.

It's because it's Claude-slop, the wording betrays it.

Punchy phrase. It does A, never B. It Xs, Ys and Zs.

These are the simple tells but the general tell is what you describe - a lot of words that say nothing.

I'm not the person you're responding to - but I do too wonder what you meant. I would surely think that among friends it's not going to be the case that a depressed person soapboxing is met with the response you describe. I think I would agree with you if it's somewhat of a wider circle - acquaintances perhaps - that I'd expect the average response to play out as you described. But also perhaps the term soapboxing could mean something different to me - I assumed because you mention a depressive person it would be more personal, but if it's like political venting then yeah I would probably also agree with you.

You may want to take a look at the Shannon number, we would need quite a large neural net to solve chess in this way.

There's a difference between the author being more upfront about it and straight-up lying on multiple locations that zero AI is involved. It's stated on the landing page, documentation and GitHub - and there might be more locations I havent' seen.

Personally, I would want no involvement in a project where the maintainer is this manipulative and I would find it a tragedy if any people contributed to their project.

On a side note, the NATO alphabet is quite normalised in the Netherlands - most telephone operators will default to it when providing you information and likewise there is an expectation on you to use it when providing spelling sensitive information such as emails.

Meaningless in the context of an outfit - not necessarily whether the garment itself may have meaning to someone. You may surely be in possession of a couple of random trinkets of great historic significance but if you just mesh them all together into one outfit you might simply end up with a mess on your hands. A garment may well be the centerpiece of an outfit - but it is ultimately always the combination that is important.

Im sure you've seen examples of this yourself - you can absolutely sport a Ray Ban in good taste and you've almost surely seen someone believe themselves to be fashionable because they are wearing a Ray Ban.

Also, I'm not suggesting fashion as a whole is about combing outfits - merely that being able to combine varying pieces of clothing into a cohesive whole is an expression of good taste.

When used in the domain of fashion "good taste" describes someone who has a unique way of selecting clothes that just mesh well together - clothes that by themselves independently are meaningless, no matter their make or quality, but when combined together create a powerful effect - much greater than the sum of their parts.

I was hoping the article would go in that direction - what subjective combination is a software engineer deciding on that you can argue is truly a matter of taste and not just a technical decision about a trade-off.

I would say this this article itself may be an example of bad taste. It meanders across a couple of disparate topics in software engineering, independently each section is competently written but as a whole they really don't sell the "look" the article was aiming for.

(I don't mean to discourage future writing by the author - I think it's a potentially excellent choice of topic. I'm just giving my two cents here on the execution.)

It didn't literally cause a regime change but the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia was essentially the last nail in the coffin for the Milosevic regime.

The key element is where the will of the people points - Milosevic was already unpopular and the bombing further united the people against him.

The few Iranians I know are against the regime, but I don't know how the wider picture looks.