naavis

What kind of flaws did you have in mind?

What kind of image classification do you do at home?

Looks cool, but the site is very heavy! I have an RTX 3070 GPU, and GPU usage went shot to 70% when I opened this website on Firefox.

I can only speak from my own experiences, but I have found commit messages extremely helpful, when they explain the "why" of the change. And as unfortunate as it is, many of us also have to work with unreadable codebases.

They are incredibly helpful when you are trying to find where a bug was introduced, and trying to figure out why some piece of code is the way it is.

Brave is based on Chromium, so that rules it out for the author based on what they wrote.

So a proper title for the piece would be "A humpback whale briefly suckles on kayaker".

Indeed, "incredibly precise estimate of the user's location" feels like an exaggeration. But still, very interesting!

In many parts of the world it is illegal for a recruiting party to search for information on a candidate without their consent.

Virtually every profession is also more forgiving to failures.

No, they say they are not going to store a bitmap in a texture, which is not the same thing as embedding directly in the shader code.

You could compare that to storing some data in a separate file which needs to be read during runtime versus embedding the data directly in the source code.

Why do you find it hard to read?

> psychopathic scammers like Robert Martin

That is a pretty wild take. Would you like to elaborate on that?