mvzvm

This is great. Really looking forward to learning more about this. I wonder how automated it will be.

It's nice to see when a government has its priorities straight.

.

.

.

/s

It's a real breakdown of empathy. People only see skin color for their interpretation of "like me". There is so much to being a person, but this is the first thing people see, so it becomes insanely overrepresented.

Your example makes no sense. How would blizzard banning a wow account (I don't know the game particularly well, but let's just use this since you brought it up) be solved w/ Blockchain?

In comparing it to the mid 90s web, you miss three things:

Everyone I knew was using 90's web. Home pages, websites for companies, movies, etc. It just wasn't really monetized or centralized into the big tech brands you listed. There was already real use for it, even if it wasn't remotely close to its final product form.

There was very little scamming involved. Nothing the likes of which we see with ICOs, pump and dump schemes, etc.

There was also a real spirit of openness and transparency, people pushing open source, an advocacy for a "world wide web", etc. Blockchain is the opposite, where everyone is trying to carve out their own little kingdom and push their own scam coins up.

Can you elaborate?

I am very open. Focus on the statement, not the person.

Are they? I've had no issues with remittances outside of blockchain. In places where I have heard remittances are difficult, it is usually due to regulation, something this does not solve either.

In his own example, it went from patent to useful in a few months. Blockchain has not gone from idea to useful at all yet.

Hard? Nothing. Useful? Nope.

What a strange response. Did you respond to the wrong comment?

Scam after scam, that's all blockchain is. Just another way to fleece the average consumer.

There has not been a single valuable use, a single product, that actually improves anyone's day / process / life / anything. I am very open to changing my stance if someone presents evidence to the contrary.

Nice find. I stand corrected.

RTAPI is the internal name. Why would it be mentioned here?

I left too late. The engineering in that company was abysmal.

I worked at Uber for a few years.

This was a terrible layer. Everyone hated it when I was there. People ended up building logic directly into the API gateway because it was so difficult to use.

I am so glad to never have to look at RTAPI again.