munchler

This is a cool idea.

I was tempted to comment that there’s no evidence that you can make anything complex out of dark matter, but it turns out that some physicists hypothesize that “self-interacting” dark matter could bind into something like atoms and molecules, so carry on!

The person you’re replying to didn’t say “every” or even “most”. They said “me”. There’s no argument or stereotype being invoked at all.

FWIW `foo in bar` implies iteration to me, not a path. In the .NET world, for example, `bar` would be a collection that we’re iterating through, assigning each element to `foo` in turn.

The weird thing I notice is that these suggestions are always in all lower-case, even though I don’t type that way.

This is a cool example of abstract math having a direct impact on a real-world situation. Actually, two different cool examples, both clearly explained. Nice!

This is an excellent explainer. I noticed one important flaw in the setup, though: Toad assigns multiple puzzles on page 5, but by page 10 all the machines seem to be working on the same puzzle.

I'm not sure how this maps onto reality. If each agent had a different problem to solve, how did they cooperate?

As a fan of the Curry-Howard correspondence, I approve of this decision.

> The strongest argument I see for continuing to train much smarter models quickly is the need to build defensive systems against the dangers posed by other AI.

Yikes! I really wonder about the cognitive dissonance necessary to work at OpenAI these days. They’re in an arms race to build a machine god, knowing full well that it could end humanity.

It seems like AI to me as well. “That’s the gap” is a familiar Claude-ism, as are the references to a “pivot” and the use of “touch” to mean “affect”.

To be fair, I’ve reached the point where most random blog posts I read on the internet seem AI written, so it could just be confirmation bias on my part.

It’s a minimal Windows app, so the whole idea is to rely on Windows DLLs as much as possible.

Well, yes, but negative numbers are also well known to every high school math student.

A human child would just say “I don’t know”.

Why is subtraction not part of the algebra? It’s certainly familiar to every high school math student. This omission allows the counterexample, so the reveal is a bit of a disappointment IMHO.

What a beautiful illustration. It makes intuitive the very abstract concepts discussed in the text. It’s fun to zoom in and browse around the structure.

Thank you. The OP's article is clearly AI-written.