mrigor

It seems like an ethical move if you agree with Peter Thiel's model of stagnant US. Since we don't grow anymore, the only way for advancement is for others to step aside. We're not creating new spots from expansion like in the 50s. So taking up high earning spots to accumulate above self sustaining amount is taking jobs from others that haven't reached their FIRE number (which could be seen as unethical). This doesn't apply to new/growing fields like tech.

Spending usually looks like a smile curve, high at first (travel, hobbies, toys) then low (done all the things) then high (medical bills).

yeah, it supports macros

what BT accessories did you settle on?

Do earplugs not work for these?

He bought 50k of Out of The Money PUTs expiring next day. So he bet AAPL would go down. When market opened AAPL went up and his 50k options would expire worthless at the end of day.

To get the leveraged money he bought stock and sold CALLs against it. RH has a bug where they give you credit for the premium collected instead of reducing buying power.

You don't have to rent their modem

selling insurance to buy insurance defeats the point, ATM options only pay for expected moves so you have no protection gain with your strategy

Are you referring to gamma hedging or another strategy?

For those playing the earnings:

After-hours: 12.10 -11.16%