Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
There isn't a shared understanding, people's intuitions disagree.
Comment · 5 years ago
Physician, heal thyself, and thus preserve us from having to listen to your drivel.
Comment · 5 years ago
What gives you the right to feel ashamed on behalf of someone else's actions, just because you're of the same race as them? Shame on you, virtue-chaser.
Comment · 5 years ago
Are men any more attracted to a woman if she's tanned or not? Have they ever been? The status involved changes, and women find status attractive, but men don't care as much when it comes to what to fuck.

And have men ever not appreciated a nice, big ass?

For that matter, there's variance in what people like today; presumably there was before. And yet there are invariants- clear skin, symmetrical face/body plan.

Some of the differences in what's attractive (which breast/ass size is most attractive) also have to do with the life history strategy of the man in question. Pump and dump-oriented guys are more likely to find larger breasts most exciting (you have 10 seconds to pick the most genetically fit woman out of this lineup and 10 minutes to inseminate her; then you'll never see her again. What strategy works? Select for oversized secondary sex characteristics, female equivalent to peacock tails- costly signal of excess resources), whereas slower life-history strategy men will find smaller breasts more attractive and care about women's intelligence more (slow strategy- order, planning, division of labour, stability).

Comment · 5 years ago
You mean spend more time screaming at the other side on twitter, egged on by GPT-13?
Comment · 5 years ago
The robots will be making better AAA games than humans before they're able to clean a house as well as a human.
Comment · 5 years ago
I wonder how many friends that attitude will win you.
Comment · 5 years ago
Yes, flog yourself! Repent for your sins! If you draw enough blood on your back, the plague will stop!
Comment · 5 years ago
Of course, whenever I say bitcoin, think monero. And if you know their address, so do the feds ;)
Comment · 5 years ago
There are at least some proposals that use ionised particles in the earth's upper atmosphere as a conductive elements, meaning you don't need a loop as such- just a wire pointing towards the earth with a big metal ball on the end. Lorentz force means you can accelerate prograde or retrograde.
Comment · 5 years ago
Speed is also extremely expensive due to the rocket equation- changing your velocity, that is.
Comment · 5 years ago
'Laser brooms' are one idea. I think you still have to be able to resolve the debris, but the idea is to end up causing assymetric light-induced thrust on the debris, deorbiting it faster (by heating the prograde side).

Another very 'interesting' idea is deploying a large amount of fine dust on an appropriate polar orbit. Everything intersecting that orbit will be sandblasted, increasing drag; this will have the greatest effect on the smallest debris, and hopefully anything operational in that orbit will be well enough armored or able to dodge the cloud. The dust deorbits quickly for the same reason as the tiny debris (greater surface area/volume). One of the more metal ideas for space debros handling I've heard.

Comment · 5 years ago
I wonder if you could take payments in bitcoin to print out epubs/pdfs of books in high quality, bind them, and ship them to people. The bitcoin's to avoid the copyright ninjas; you could try to silk-road the whole operation. It'll be easier once we have better drones and automated cars.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton