Recent submissions

Comment · 24 days ago
I also use colima mostly, it‘s great! (the Apple container thing de facto requires macos 26+)
Comment · 24 days ago
Comment · 24 days ago
Comment · 1 month ago
assembler?
Comment · 1 month ago
You‘ll notice a lot of "I found"s and "my hunch"s and similar in the comments.

There aren’t many comparative benchmarks, and obviously the design of such a benchmark is difficult, but, e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09101

In this benchmark, models can correctly solve Rust problems 61% on first pass — A far cry from other languages such as C# (88%) or Elixir (97%, no static typing whatsoever).

Comment · 1 month ago
Is the code open source? It‘s not part of the protocol design system?
Comment · 1 month ago
Do they have the design system open source somewhere?
Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 1 month ago
One can skip the Erlang-specific things/the description of the programming language.

Just the first 2 chapters (~30p) + the Conclusion (~10p) contain a lot of useful food for thought.

Comment · 7 months ago
Comment · 7 months ago
Comment · 7 months ago
That’s all in the article. The author goes into the confusion that it had the Apple logo on it.

Win was conceived as a modifier reserved for the OS (not to be used by applications), while command never was. Command is for commands. If you come to the Mac from Win or Linux it often helps to think of command as what ctrl does on those systems. Ctrl on the Mac started as Terminal-Emulator specific modifier— Which to this day is great, because your universal copy shortcut (cmd-c) and interrupt (ctrl-c) are different things.

Indeed one would map win to command, but only because you need another key for a modifier that‘s not ctrl or opt/alt, conceptually they are different

Comment · 8 months ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09101

In this benchmark, models can correctly solve Rust problems 61% on first pass — A far cry from other languages such as C# (88%) or Elixir (a “buggy dynamic language”) where they perform best (97%).

I wonder why that is, it’s quite surprising. Obviously details of their benchmark design matter, but this study doesn’t support your claims.

Comment · 8 months ago
C.f., from 25d ago:

“Why Elixir is the best language for AI” https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46900241

- for comparison of the arguments made

- features a bit more actual data than “intuitions” compared to OP

- interesting to think about in an agent context specifically is runtime introspection afforded by the BEAM (which, out of how it developed, has always been very important in that world) - the blog post has a few notes on that as well

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton