mohamedkoubaa

Refusing to use technology isn't the Amish way, they communally decide how and when to use technology.

This is also slowly being addressed

People still love oral story telling (standup). Adding more immersion doesn't necessarily enhance the experience.

I would want a python implementation with a JIT and the ability to choose JIT or no-JIT when defining a python environment. And I want all my libraries to work either way.

I'll get what I want eventually but I might be retired by then.

This is slowly being addressed now, each version of Python sees the c API become more opaque.

Imo the highest leverage thing they could do is unionize

The best orgs have style guide that restrict features

"Many-worlds just states there is no such thing as wave function collapse" is the emotional statement. The contempt for many-worlds is both principled and rational.

Not really, humanity's time is very finite on a planet with finite resources. If we don't build it soon enough it won't get built.

If AI is brains then investors are zombies

Having animals eat animals is food. An animal is food, a human isn't. I can draw up some hay, animals eat it, and another animal eats it. That still counts as food I would say, we're just changing the organism. Otherwise you would have to say that dogs aren't animals because it's too far removed from plants.

Humans can run on different diets

If instructing an agent is programming then your boss 10 years ago telling you what the software should do is also programming

Fortran invented array-based programming, which arguably numpy advanced and now Julia finally perfected