mlmlmasd
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
If you want to go that route, then none of the advertising companies, or companies that make money from advertising are providing the content either. There are several steps before the content comes from some person's mind to your computer, the ISP is one of those steps.
> Care to explain how this is backwards progress and lifts pressure on the industry?
You want me to explain how an initiative to not block a subset of ads alleviates the pressure from blocking all ads? Seems pretty trivial to me.
> This is a company and extension that only makes it harder for the existing ad networks to continue.
Nope. They did make it harder before, when they weren't taking money from advertising companies to not hide ads, and weren't launching initiatives such as the topic of this thread.
I've never had free internet... which ISP do you use?
> It's because of perverse incentives and a lack of regulation in the entire industry that force bad formats, fraudsters, malware, and the pursuit of data and volume to win over quality and user experience.
The whole point of advertising is to trick people into buying shit they don't need.
> As much as I don't care for the ABP approach, it's something that can be used to actually make progress and that's what this is, progress.
This is a step backwards, not progress.
> It's finally some outside pressure on the industry to change from the segment of the advertising mechanism that matters most - the people themselves.
Bullshit. This is a way of lifting the pressure on the industry, and this initiative is mostly supported by players in the industry. Not the people.
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-microsoft-amazon-taboo...
> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".
To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system.
Make it public?
No it's not.