mk12
Joined 7 years ago
Karma
490
Submissions
112
Member since
Mar 1
Joined 7 years ago
> Most of the path is automated; a person's attention goes where the risk is
> The eval grows with every incident, and every change to the reviewer is scored against all of it.
This will be great for storing my AI data in the AI era of AI.
Please just give us the prompt.
No one's been giving passes bewildering or otherwise for sweeping issues under the rug, because that didn't happen. The 0.16 release notes are linking to plenty of GitHub issues. If you have additional information to post on an issue then you can copy it to Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/issues/30027
> Most of the path is automated; a person's attention goes where the risk is
--> We automate as much as possible, focusing human attention on risky parts
> The eval grows with every incident, and every change to the reviewer is scored against all of it.
--> We run reviewer evals against every incident
But that's just my interpretation and my voice. I can't know for sure what the authors would have said if they took the time to write it themselves.