misanthropemigh

I don't think this is necessarily true at all. Objectively is very long stretch before we observe whether this the right approach or not. AI can increase the code quality the issue as i see is not this and it's neither mentioned in what I read about their decision, it's mainly the issue of not being able to keep up when the bar for creating have decreased significantly and the capacity to curate and evaluate is still the same. This is case where the system is overwhelmed so you start controlling the input to keep the desired output the same.

It's great that you recognize that as your opinion.

I never understood this argument and I think it doesn't make sense. It can be argued that, as such, individuals and animals also cause harm and damage to society (whatever this is) by their interest and convenience-seeking behavior.

Nature may cause innumerable cruel and harmful things to society.

Being born causes cruelty and harm because it imposes suffering on life.

I wish I could understand or make sense of what you are saying there, although this is not even the right place, so never mind.