minsc__and__boo
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
I also didn't say you transfer directly into Kraken. Instead, you would use at least 1 or 2 other wallets before transferring into Kraken, because that bypasses their scanning.
Kraken is still cheaper while doing that than paying a 10% fee for an ATM.
Text available on Google cache:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VhqweeF...
That means the transactions can't be traced to your KYC wallet on Kraken, meaning you're spending 10% on an ATM for no reason.
That's precisely the problem with crypto though - most problems get blamed on the user, and not highlighted as the deficit it is for the crypto.
It doesn't make a difference if you using a Bitcoin ATM or transfer to your Kraken account (except a 10% fee for the former).
It's the opposite.
Amazon wants you to click back into the store to buy things. One way to do that is forcing you to view orders in the store instead of your email inbox. They care more about that than Google seeing your purchase history.
This was my thought as well, but they're planning on doing more interfaces than what they're listing now, so it may be they went for universibility with the size.
Also USB-A is going to slowly die off anyways, so I doubt it's good to build the dongle standard to two USB-As.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/china-social-media...
More to the author's point, in a free market you can have consumer watchdogs providing transparency, but even they can still be drowned out by "privacy"-based branding from giants.
Sometimes you just need a shovel, not a Bagger 288.
You still need to create a wallet, key, etc. and that is not easy to do for beginners without an exchange like Kraken. Most DNMs use temporary addresses so it's not a good idea to try to transfer directly from a bitcon ATM to a DNM.