mimischi

> both ethically and financially/career-wise, imo.

And, most importantly, you weren’t sent to the slaughterhouse and are still alive, thanks to your choice.

If I wanted to build something like this, at least conceptually with the roles, where’d I start? My first guess would be to give Claude your blog post; but any other pointers to make it work reliably? Do you happen to have the system open source?

In today’s day and age I read the OP as saying that threw an LLM at the extension repo and had it reimplement/improve upon for a private fork of theirs.

Do you remember every sandwich or just this one in particular?

This but for motorbikes. I can’t stand people riding them through residential areas in London late at night, revving their engines.

I thought anything in the US is ridiculous amounts of money, when it’s related to health/hospital.

Maybe the editor is from Germany DACH, or similar?). A trillion is a billion in that language.

Care to explain how this relates to Leopold? I know they hold some stake in Anthropic, but I’m not proficient enough in the topic to jump to the conclusion you’re alluding to.

I can relate to this feeling, having encountered it many times in academia. But the inverse would also be true, would you stop reading yet another article that explains for the umpteenth time what library Y does? Not arguing for the author, but there’s certainly something about knowing and writing for your audience.

The animation in the background is fun, but really impairs readability on mobile. At least there’s Reader mode in browsers, but a pity that the original form isn’t accessible!

> „[…] but the fact is many PhD students do still graduate with very unexamined understanding of science, cognition, philosophy, etc.”

Is there some generally accepted definition what it should take to graduate with a PhD?

Why are some areas more observed than others then?

Agreed. This reeks LLM writing with no human oversight, or at least a human with no writing experience. The text underneath “The Click” is an immediate giveaway:

> Five milliseconds of hardware and browser bookkeeping before a single byte leaves the laptop.

I don’t even know how to describe it, but the “[…] before X” sentence style stands out to me.

Is this the fastest Google has killed one of its own products (features)?