miles_matthias
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I've also started noticing people annotating a whole doc "written by humans" to try to convey effort and care. That's fine for some things but do that too often and a reader will be left with two thoughts:
1. Did they actually write this by hand? No way 2. Should they have written some of this with AI? Seems like a waste of time formatting some of this when they could've been spending their time thinking critically
Replying "yes, book it" is way easier than clicking through a ton of UIs on disparate websites.
My opinion is that agents looking to "one-shot" tasks is the wrong UX. It's the async, single simple interface that is way easier to integrate into your life that's attractive IMO.
I'm a cloud consultant with a background in web & mobile app dev. I love helping app developers build & release quickly & safely through scalable infrastructure & automated CI/CD & build systems.
I specialize in Kubernetes, Bazel, Spinnaker, Istio, and am a certified Google Cloud Architect. I've spent the last 18 months partnering with Google to migrate their largest customers.
Read more at HireMiles.com. Email me at [email protected].
Location: Colorado
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: GCP/AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Istio, Spinnaker, Bazel, Ruby/Rails, Java, iOS, Android
Résumé/CV: https://linkedin.com/in/milesmatthias, hiremiles.com
Email: [email protected]But I'm focusing on my environment and the habits. Doing the daily habit as best I can.
Then why not pay a fraction of the money you're earning on offering these tools back to the open source community? Using something like GitHub's new funding tools?
1. AI exists and is widely used 2. A person only has so much bandwidth. If they put out 10 docs in a day, did they really hand write them all?