mildchalupa
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
This is sort of a problem if a society depends on them as a piece of critical infrastructure. If a city owns a bus route and needs to evacuate a population, they can just do it by edict.
No one is considering this edge case and how it should be handled at Uber. A company or community that has pride in what they offer would probably provide rides for free during such an anomaly. This is a drawback on the scalability of technology as we currently implement it.
Though the entire set is probably more useful and practical.
Partially because these systems are far simpler for adding audiovisuals however the utility of an organized system with archived knowledge is lost. When Photobucket took down user uploaded content troves of niche information were lost. I do hope that as the cost of saving data reduces over time that data rot is generally reduced. Troves of nontrivial knowledge being destroyed is abhorrent.
Primarily I believe that the difficulty is in the fact that social media is designed to be addictive. Not to be an archive of knowledge.
This is astoundingly obvious when you park an unmodified 80's-90's vehicle next to something new.
The question to me is what overall reduces mortality rates, improved roll-over and side impact protection or driver visibility?
Personally I think blind spots everywhere suck and would much prefer better visibility.
The cost difference is small but it's indicative of a larger issue of disposability. One of the reasons Japanese vehicles started to dominate was that they lasted longer. This is due to better tolerances, more efficient engines, and more robust component design.
The Toyota production method, lean and just-in-time were mostly methods for rationalizing better systems to eliminate waste within production and to minimize inventory. Such methods don't inherently make a better car though they leave more io the table to spend on coatings, quality parts etc.