mickey7

i'm puzzled and somewhat amused with the downvotes because i'm aiming for maximum honesty and truth. the market organises to elevate the best and raise standards for all others - it's like a force of nature, whereas government seems to systematically mismanage libraries into mediocre grey soulless underused smelly wastelands.

neighbourhood watch and locally funded andor volunteer police, vigilanteesm & personal responsibility

fire insurance includes fire department service. you can go cheap and risk burning down but it's more likely that decent friendly neighbours will gladly cover yours if you can't. or you can move to more affordable housing within your means

health insurance with discounts for taking care of yourself

competition between doctors and between pharmaceuticals driving innovation, skills and real results forward while driving prices down.

would you rather get chemo for pennies while someone else can get immortality for millions or would you rather pay millions for chemo equally with everyone else

private or shared roads according to free will and common mutual interest

i don't want just anyone to come in to my house as they please. or my driveway, or if my driveway is very long = my road

i'm responsible for my property amd my own actions. i don't want to tell you what to do and i don't want your money. we can agree to exchange things for mutual benefit and i will do everything i can to keep to agreed terms - staking my word and reputation

there is nothing wrong with public libraries or charity regardless if selfish or for common good as long as it's funded with free will instead of threat of tax prison

crappy mismanaged unused library should go broke while the good library can pay for itself with fees and donations

just like your startup

yes. i think the warm fuzzy feeling is how the body internally represents the vague and unspecific expectation of 'social' reward from doing something that benefits others

the sense of something being a 'good deed' comes from expecting harmony and general social cooperation (reciprocity) and since the cause effect is so disconnected and complex - it's too difficult to grasp with reason (for some people) and just has to be felt in this way. (?)

also the neurological 'mirroring' and empathy

.. anyways. people who want and use the library should pay for it. people who don't should not pay. isn't this fair?

he is not an ethical hacker. he did not offer his services to facebook to agree on a price. hacked it of his own initiative

then disclosed the vulnerabilities with his real identity which means he assumed-expected to somehow benefit, probably not financial - just craved recognition / 'pat on the back' / coolness / job offer

acted like a muppet

i'd rather not pay for other people's benefits unless the benefit returns to me with reasonable probability and period of time. on one hand i'd like to see libraries turn profit (like 'lite' version of video rental model) or at least be self sufficient. on the other hand i want to enjoy reasonably educated population with easy access to methods for self improvement and economic mobility (both up and down) and a 'safety net' in case of uninsured unforeseen events. there's a balance between socialism and pure libertarian model but its so local and complicated and constantly evolving that i just resign myself toward the purest liberty and self responsibility and say fuck the libraries.

i sense a disconnect in the premise. do non-technical people really need latex? - to invest the time to study prettyness of presentation... depends on definition, scope and degree of technical'ness but generally i'd think they (should) focus on quality of content in their own field because it's just much cheaper to outsource the nonessentials (latex being one of them) to more competent experts who dedicate lifetimes to 'making the presentation pretty'

for a simple hack to keep exposure to novelty & variety i suggest just using negative filters to downvote the disliked content

thus the more novel the content - the higher up it will remain

unless it's an article about a novel completely revolutionary arrangement of old ideas which you never liked on their own :)

understand it and replicate it

for me the few extra brain cycles required to overcome this stutter actually burned the name into my memory.

related to why i remembered 'google' for the goofy name (except how many oo's) in early 2000's

and 90 minutes approximates the 6billion people well enough. and the task is so simple and specific that i will actually use it.. wow

btw please allow to skip selection of minutes or default to 0 so example

[5] [(minute)] [AM] [calculate]

guerilla tactic: if the trial ever proceeded it would have launched this guy's film career by giving him immense public exposure instead of just another sob story on reddit.

why did it take the lead of the studio's lawyer's team to make the phone call - it would imply how seriously they were concerned about real potential risks.

instead his surrender was exactly what the studio lawyers aimed for.

btw since this was 10 years ago it's conveniently outside the statute of limitations for slander - so he doesn't have to prove this story is even real and not just viral promotion bs for his lame student project.