meragrin

Different numbers. One is cars stolen/population. The other is cars stolen/registered cars.

What prevents you putting a dish up on a pole/post to get a signal?

If Russia is willing to use nukes over Ukraine, what makes you think it won't end in nukes any how? There is no way Ukraine is the stopping point if they are willing to use nukes to secure Ukraine.

No, 3rd gen for bendable screens is still preview stage. I would consider 5th gen pre-production. It really won't be mainstream until 8+.

> We can argue the whole day, but this is not a tailored fee as is not build based on my personal behavior.

You can argue all day, but it doesn't change the fact your main argument was you would no longer be charged based on facts but assumptions. The current method is largely based on assumption. Using actual data on your driving is not an assumption.

It may not have been your intention but that is how you wrote it. Two statements about no longer being charged based on facts, but on assumptions. One comment linking using your actual driving data as "assumption".

> welcome to the era of tailored fees based on assumptions rather than facts. > It used to be that you'd get a high insurance fee only if you cause incidents or damage.

> There are factors such as driver experience, age

So making assumptions based on "driver experience" and age is not making assumptions?

> And most of the respectable news organisations still abide by the core tenets of journalism e.g. multiple, vetted sources.

And which ones are those?

So one guy is now many?

> many of them armed

I haven't heard of more than 5 firearms. No mention of where those were. Videos I have seen just show flags, signs, cameras, and mobile phones. What were these "many" armed with?

There was a post remarking about how China did not need a vaccine to get covid under control. Facebook flagged it as false information. They linked to an article which talked extensively about how China used lockdowns, contact tracing, masks, hand washing, and other things which were clearly not vaccines to get covid under control. Most of the vaccine talk was about anti-vaxxers and how Chinese weren't like that. There was a short blurb about how Chinese vaccines were still in phase 3 trials with several hundred thousand people given the vaccine. That's not going to make a big dent in California let alone China. None of the articles the "fact checking" article linked to even mentioned vaccines when talking about how China got it under control.

Aren't they claiming Assange participated in some way? Either by providing help or suggesting what to get?

The World HEALTH Organization? Not someone I would look to about whether destroying property is considered violence.

Why would it decrease it? It seems to me it would only increase it. The people likely to get the flu are the same group likely to get covid. The flu is harder to get than covid.

If YouTube does as good a job as Facebook, then I have zero faith it won't just become partisan censorship. I have seen "False Information" labels on Facebook posts which were linked to "fact checking articles" which confirmed the post as true rather than false.

She wasn't fired. She made it clear she could not work there her demands were not met and would resign. Google accepted her resignation.