Recent submissions

Comment · 7 years ago
Going all in on the "unintelligible black box" model of health insurance, I see.
Comment · 8 years ago
Since I can't respond to my own child comment as it was flagged, I'll just note that when I made it, this comment said only:

   The rest of us have to compete in a free market for our skills. Why not doctors?
And the rest was added later.
Comment · 8 years ago
a profession as wealthy as medicine needs the taxpayer to fund its training is preposterous

Most doctors already come from wealthy families (specifically, they have doctor parents) because in addition to the tuition of medical school, there are a variety of other expenses (board examination fees, the undergraduate requirement, interview expenses for both medical school and residency) that are difficult to fund without assistance. Also, compensation for physicians is not what you seem to think it is outside of subspecialized fields, and the expense of medical school (and the opportunity cost of residency) means that physician shortages in the general disciplines will only continue to get worse as medical students realize the only way they can pay back their loans is to subspecialize.

Also, medical schools are primarily limited by number of faculty, and it's difficult to find doctors for med school faculty roles... because they're so poorly compensated in comparison to other opportunities.

If you want more doctors, first provide incentives for doctors to teach, then provide funding for those who normally don't see medical school as an available opportunity, then incentivize people to go into general disciplines, then properly compensate residents so they're not throwing away ten years of potential income, then complain about how "doctors are overpaid but there's also a big shortage of them".

Comment · 8 years ago
Healthcare is much closer to auto repair than software development.

Sure, on a car that's running that you can't turn off, with parts you can't replace, a maintenance history you can't see, and an ECU that actively misrepresents what's going on.

Comment · 8 years ago
This is manifestly not the case, and there are a large number of studies showing why this is true (many linked elsewhere in this thread). Most people do not have a good understanding of the risks associated with ongoing medical testing/medical visits.

A hopefully not-too-inaccurate analogy might be if you heard a strange sound while driving your car, and took it into your mechanic, whose shop gets paid more the more tests they do and the more labor they put into fixing your potential non-problem, and they're potentially liable if anything later goes wrong that could be traced to that sound. Think about where the systemic incentives lie.

Comment · 8 years ago
you are basically accusing them of foolish behavior at best, fraud/unethical behavior at worst

Given the conflict of interest in this article, I'd say that's the least of what the authors should be accused of.

Comment · 8 years ago
I'm sure he's proud to have his name on the only major trauma center in the US without a helipad due to NIMBY pressure.
Comment · 8 years ago
The way many metabolic conditions work is that essential products are not synthesized, or toxic products are not cleared. These can cause unrecoverable damage within hours or days of birth if not treated. So, tests are performed to identify known metabolic conditions to prevent newborns from suffering unrecoverable brain/otherwise damage. This is generally known as "newborn screening" if you are curious to learn more.
Comment · 8 years ago
We (for the most part) intrinsically understand the internal nature of naturally generated thoughts, even spontaneous ones. If someone played a recording of your own speech, would you have difficulty determining if you had thought the words or heard them?
Comment · 8 years ago
This is a reasonable statement to want to make, but (with a vanishingly small number of exceptions), suicide is not a choice. It's the result of depression combined with loss of inhibition (due to stress, chemical imbalance, or other factors). Your rational state of mind now has no bearing on whether you are capable of taking your own life under certain circumstances.
Comment · 9 years ago
A favorite of mine from medical school... "two drinks a day!"

Oh yeah? What do you usually drink?

"A box of wine and a handle of whiskey."

Comment · 9 years ago
Residents barely have time to eat (we called it "low food security"), let alone consider their mental health. I've actually heard it vocalized as a strategy for hospital administration -- keep the residents absurdly overworked and stressed out (and with no way out, since almost all of them have so much debt that leaving the profession is not an option), and they can't muster the coordination to do anything about their terrible working conditions.
Comment · 9 years ago
Easily, the single most vocal group about piece work payments are the medical doctors I've talked to.

To be fair, there are unusual incentives in place here -- depending on the specific circumstances, each individual task or procedure a doctor performs may end up being coded differently for insurance reimbursement purposes. The focus of doctors on piece work is incentivized by the way insurance works.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton