megaremote

> Just take their current flagship smartphone, double the thickness to fit a halfway-between-smartphone-and-full-frame sensor, an SD card slot, ability to export RAWs, and a compact zoom lens, and sell it for like $2000.

And no one will buy it. It has been tried before, by Nokia.

The rent-a-gym, I guess the west solves that by having gym equipment in a park? An interesting solution to a busy city.

Since this has a range of 4km, it requires a controller. There is now way to get that distance without one.

This is pretty good, 30 min flight time and 4km range.

> 4 km for FCC compliant Model (MT1SS5) and 2 km for CE compliant Model (MT1SD25).

No one is attacking json here.

> I'm a marathoner

Ok, but listening to music is cheating.

Blackmailing a hitman might not be the best idea.

Of course they do. There is only reward and no downside to doing that. They save a few seconds, and no one is giving out tickets for doing this.

It is clearly not an article, it is question someone posed. Here is the answer.

Like Youtube, which lost money every year until it was bought by Google. Or Instagram? Or a variety of others.

You don't understand why people want to copy those models of growths and get those big payouts? Which part confuses you?

Get rid of your car for starters. Shop at markets where they don't cover anything in plastic. Adjust what you eat around avoiding buying plastic, as much as you can.

> Yet I observe on Twitter and other social media that these problems are considered equally important, sometimes people even treat them as equivalent.

How are you even judging that?

The consumers should pay. Every piece of plastic should have a recycling cost, like they do in some states with bottles and cans.

> Ocean plastic is a problem, but comes almost entirely from intentional dumping

Right, like microplastics from the tires whenever anyone drives anywhere?