meganvito

If it is truely a big problem, it will be more strengthful to let the denying end to fully deploy their defense. The hope may the system resilient enough not on an irreversable track which has a penalty not bailable.

Is it because the Berkeley dudes ain't that hippy any more?

I guess you are not in California.

Namely the incompetence in other sectors.

I think it is the government to be blamed failed to give a proper direction of the hot money.

The flow of capital tends toward a low hydrolic potential from a high end. When the potential is lost, things turn to medicore, people just look around for an exit.

Just curious, for such a big system, how the quality of such a large service system is assured? Even just for a single state.

You may present the argument you consider as well excused. My point is that in the area of HVAC and environmental engineering departments in the universities at the time, the "ozone hole" argument was in-disputable. So my metaphor is that, the DMV may propose or just stipulate the best driving protocol for humanoid on a motor vehicle. The contrary motion may need more comprehensive and comprehensible materials to be sound.

As a former HVAC engineering student, I was quite caught by "ozone" in this headline. Sorry, I did not continue with that career for some reason, for good or for bad, now doing an IT job. This ozone thing was talked about almost everyday, not everyday then very often, throughout the four-year study. I think it is a good example of "We did something, so a disaster did not happen". Maybe, also we should learn that we cannot let some people to prove they can create a disaster.

To be fair, I have not had the honor to be a docker customer. But regarding the kernel thing, I have limited IFY. Let's say if you goal is to keep yourself up-to-date with kernel tree, probably you have to compile the kernel DIY. The hardware dependencies and customized kernel config is not that handy. Then if you pick a distro, probably, not sure it is a problem, things like initd sneak into systemd/sysctl brought the element of surprises occasionally. While, to move or not to move, both are forwarding and backwarding.

I think that may be more compact, if the IDE can reflect the algebra beneath the SQL clauses.

Or say, just the particles are the "insiders" of the "established system", while the barrier not.

I am not sure but have a question, is the barrier a kind of potential implied in the system?

I see a trend to use arxiv for FLAG publichmonde. Not sure this is another BIG thing.

So far, we don't have any other proved examples to pass knowledge especially between generations than books.