meeech

question: anyone recognize that eval UI or is it something they made in-house?

if you find yourself in montreal, message me - i will do it, for science!

something requiring navigating stairs while holding something full like a laundry basket. bronze - straight stairs, silver - one 90deg turn. gold - spiral.

something requiring co-ordination between 2 robots. think relay race which the olympics has. So say, moving a couch together.

btw love the idea and the silver body suit. good stuff.

their product doesn't taste like crap. Unless you meant it tasted like crap to you? I liked it as the 'meat' in a veg chilli for example.

thanks. to be clear, I'm not asking the q to be particularly negative about it. Its more just curiosity, mixed with trade in effort. If you wrote it 100%, I'm more inclined to read the whole thing. vs say now just feeding it back to the GPM to extract the condensed nuggets.

Disallow edit in test dirs is a good tip. thanks.

I meant though in the wider context of the team - everyone uses it but not everyone will work the same, use the same underlying prompts as they work. So how do you ensure everyone keeps to that agreement?

Q: How do you ensure tests are only written by humans? Basically just the honor system?

Honest question: approx what percent of the post was human vs machine written?

don't discount the value of a good docs site. that was one of things i loved about lodash that made it so easy to use, and to discover all the functionality it offered. So if you looking to replace it, would be good to have similar docs.

At this point, I think it's safe to say it doesn't 'feel' that way. It is that way. Sorry if you were being facetious and I didn't pick up on it.

Are you the one doing the coaching? Wouldn't this be part of coaching them?

because there were some interesting nuggets. Maybe nothing new to you - but not everyone has read everything on the topic. though this was more about their process rather than an 'engine'. but you know, headlines /shrug

I've been pretty happy with Codeium free offering. it does good context completions for me, and based on context, gives me the next bits I'm about to type.

I used cody at work, and the best feature for that I found was chore work - I could highlight a struct (for example) and give it instructions how to transform it and it did a good job there.