mathisfun123

hn is purely a rumor mill now (you are correct).

Is this supposed to be clever? Their assets serve their business (you know ... like any normal company) and that business is selling tokens.

There is absolutely no timeline where Apple acquires any token provider because Apple doesn't sell tokens.

as in the reddit post: "dawg the flowers are pretty and look cool its not that deep"

> releasing GPU heavy servers

this is absolutely never happening

> Unfortunate naming which conflicts with Google’s Blaze

This isn't even a public tool so how exactly does it conflict?

> It's a disaster of a language and ecosystem

"unhinged" take

> He doesn't pay TAs. The university does. They work for the university, not for individual professors.

faculty research overhead pays for department TAs. that's why departments with rich professors maintain their TAs even through budget cuts.

> If you have no idea how teaching works in US universities, probably better not to comment on it.

define:irony

"your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could they didn't stop to think if they should"

> A chat window that takes multiple seconds to respond, versus your buddy Guy who just went out on lunch.

why are you comparing to your buddy? we're talking about software products?

> as a US citizen I want to only trust other US citizens with my security

man fox news has really done a number on people's brains.....

Smoking pole means sucking dick lol so actually as tongue in cheek (no pun intended) it actually kind of works (ie someone got VC by quid pro quo sexual favors)

I don't see anyone outraged? I see someone commenting on how internet "discourse" is just gossip when it used to be fairly rigorous. Which is accurate, especially here on hn where almost every comment just repeats something from another post ("modular is going to change world" as if we all didn't see the modular content marketing piece just above.....)

FYI accusing someone of being outraged to distract from their point is called "appeal to emotion". Whether op is outraged or not has no bearing on whether the observation is accurate.

People love saying this as a gotcha. Please do tell how so.