mason240

>Hark, the Herald Tribune sings,

>Advertising wondrous things.

This line bangs

Bus drivers are not making MW anywhere.

They ask for proof, and then when you give it try to hide your comment through downvoting. Followed by saying that it doesn't even matter.

Very topical example of why these "benevolent censorship" schemes are are worse than the problem they are trying to fix.

Ben Schapiro has literally written books about how terrible the alt-right is, yet he that is what he is frequently called.

And who at the companies are making decisions about policy? Employees.

>How would the food arrive at the store?

Large, also reusable containers.

In rural areas many people feed their table scraps to chickens.

>hackers tied to Russian intelligence hacked the DNC

That was debunked this summer.

There is a coinvent sidestep to this issue.

Distributing sexual images of someone without their consent is a clear crime against that person. Children can not consent.

This is very fair criticism for standard jobs like a regular software developer.

For a role like this, where outsized skill of someone who is and needs to be elite should be rewarded with enormously outsized pay, I think this a good model.

Suppose you have transportaion company that owns 80% of the market share for everything transported on the roads. By car, van, truck, semi, everything.

Suppose your company also has a team that inspects public bridges to make sure they don't collapse.

Is it really altruistic, or given your market share is it a cost of business?

It wasn't an internal memo.

Marked down for spreading alternative facts.

Diversity of thought - of which google is now less of.

>But it's interesting how I just got swarmed by 3 commenters.

Losing an argument? Better accuse the other side of being paid shills.

Corporation caught in a scandal over censoring political speech against the right?

Better have the The Verge write a puff piece on them.