martinmunk

I did basically this exact same thing at work a few years ago.

For time-correlating audio measurements around the office buildings I needed a analog reference signal in sync.

So I drew up a PCB design with a toslink in/out connector, and a connector for a SFP module and just a lvds driver in between. It worked straight away (more luck than skill) I could then re-use network fibers already run around the basement, and convert it to analog in the MDF rooms of each building, and run the analog signal up to the 3rd floor through existing RJ45 cables.

I've been using pfSense on 4 private sites for years by now. Luckily I've not upgraded from CE. I think what pisses people off is the rugpull of them pushing people to get a free upgraded license and then removing it soon after.

As for "but its free". I think its reasonable to expect the free offering to be promotional. I know I have bough Netgate HW and license for work because I was familiar with their free offering at home. But stuff like the recent move might make me reconsider.

Yeah, I think I can see the link to Mark Rober. Although not at all to the same degree. Maybe it's the way of "acting dumb" in order to progress the discovery process, but a face that they know full well (obviously) that he knows what's going on? Essentially talking down to the audience?

Not sure. My first attempt at phrasing it did not get my feeling across well.

This one is pretty good, but I usually steer clear of his videos. Topics are pretty on point for my interests, be he just seem... Too full of himself? I don't want to be mean in any way, but if someone agrees maybe they can put a finger on what it is

My use case is to let others use the HW I manage, not to have a known linux environment.

Either if someone wants to run something as an internal service (logging, ect) which should not depend on their desktop being online, or they need beefy HW.

I've been a big advocate for LXD. Running multiple servers at work where I set up containers that I gave collegues access to and such. I find that the "VM's but not" approach quite nice.

I've since moved away completely, just before the recent moves by Canonicle. Most of if not all of my reasons to move away from LXD relate to Snap or other sides of Canonicle leadership.

I have an old industrial thermal camera that takes pretty good pictures. But I don't have the xp software for it, and without a "known good capture" it's hard to reverse engineer and make it work on Linux.

On a tangentant note, I've considered if it would be possible to gut the driver related parts (usb / Bluetooth subsystem ect) of linux and package it up to run as a userspace application in windows.

Then we could all use ps3 dualshock controllers wireless again on windows. It seems all the links to third party programs to make it work are virus infected.

I'd assume they were bridged, so you could either daisy-chain the cameras, or use it in-between the uplink and an AP. So you could it whereever you already have an AP without pulling new cables.

Worth noting is, the subtitles said "The ferry uses, each day, about 150-200 kWh" whereas the speaker said "the ferry uses today between 150 and 200kW". I'm guessing Tom Scott had him clarify later, but the units, and what could be assumed to be a timeframe or not, is not the same.

Are they, technically, any different than APT repositories?

Don't get me wrong. I hate Snap much more than the next guy, but the idea of keeping a repository so you can go look for, and discover, stuff that is supposedly also vetted by someone is nice.

The issue is, when an app store is a monopoly and not standardized.

APT repositories is, in my eyes, an example of "the good" type of app store.

Might be.

But I'd think a Give Way sign should suffice in practice even if the intersection has poor visibility. Only if the intersection proves to cheat drivers in to thinking the visibility is not so bad (and hence drivers won't slow down enough) is a Stop sign needed?

It's the old "if it looks safe but isn't".

I zoomed in on a red spot in the US and was surprised to see the city name "Uvalde" pop up. Not quite in the center of the spot, but any thoughts on if it might be related to the reason that a European like me knows that name?

I've been told by driving instructors that the rule of thumb for putting up octagon STOP signs here in Denmark is only when a serious accident has occurred.

I can't find a source for it, but they are definitely rarer than most other places, and I feel like they are taken more serious because of it.