marmetio

Both comments said it was natural. Only your original comment sort of insinuated that it wasn't.

My comment has the exact same information but with different wording and it has a score of +5. The different reception can't be due to the information content, can it?

You can probably generalize and say that most teens stress about competing or despair about their prospects. I'd nitpick your use of stats, but I don't want to miss the forest for the trees.

> flooding that occurred when the seas rose after the end of the last glaciation

The planet did this one to itself.

That's what the "site:" operator is for.

I've reverted my expectations about search engines to what they were in the early days, dusted off my old research skills, and accepted that I'm going to have to do some work myself. I still use Google, but its ability to approximate a reference librarian is diminished.

Occupational safety doesn't happen just because you think it should. Recognizing when financial incentives are insufficient is important to designing a realistic solution.

Tracking it is your hobby. It's not a waste if you enjoy doing it.

If that's true, then clearly they're doing something about it, so I don't understand why you think they're not doing enough for security. If it is aliens, why would they confirm it and start a race to get alien tech first? You can wait a bit for them to figure it out. If it's not aliens, why would they reveal the details of classified information?