margaretdouglas

I force pushed over origin/master from a very not-up-to-date feature branch and don't have the remote history I overwrote fetched locally.

Why does the most attractive male face appear suspiciously similar to Zuck?

There was some blog post on HN the other day where someone said they don't do chaos monkey anymore... Even then, how do you chaos test a novel event ahead of time?

Isn't the scale a bit different though? Surely this event was an order of magnitude more concurrent viewers than some NFL game.

I wouldn't say it's a solved problem, how many other companies are pulling off those numbers? Isn't that the current record for concurrent streams? And wasn't it mostly to mobile devices?

Doesn't twitch almost fall over (other non-massive streams impacted) when anyone gets close to 4-5m concurrent viewers? I remember last time it happened everything started falling over, even for smaller streams. Even if Netflix struggled with the event, streaming other content worked just fine for me.

Wasn't that the biggest concurrent stream ever?

Has there ever been a 300m concurrent live stream? I thought Disney+ had the record at something like 60m.

I made it about 20% before having a panic attack... formatting seems adversarial

A misconfigured or naively implemented spice rack never provided an entry point to leverage your infrastructure to engage in illegal activity and resources at your expense.

The issue is fundamentally that releasing a single game for a single fee yields linear growth, which is to say the amount your growing by is stagnant. Stagnant growth, to an investor, is essentially a signal that your company is currently failing. So unless you can grow your growth, you fail, and the only way to continue growing your growth is if new products remain cash generating indefinitely.

I wish more people would watch Dark. Horrendously underrated.

The marketing material for the movie was absolute dog water. I agree with your position there, but wish you'd take other sources and allow them to add color to your reaction to something you have only a single perspective on. Perhaps they could in form you that your reaction, based on bad information, is inaccurate. Perhaps you could use that realization as an opportunity to view the film yourself and come to your own conclusion based on the new information that your initial reaction was heavily biased based on an inaccurate portrayal of the material.

I feel like I'd find this comment more humorous if it wasn't a parody of what is actually happening.