marcd35

I'm not in the legal world, so my experience is limited from a coding perspective. I don't think AI could ever truly come up with novel arguments, at least not yet, but their value for you may be to sharpen your arguments or pull on every thread that you may not even have thought about.

For example, theres a very popular coding skill set call Matt Pocock's Grill Me where it just asks you a relentless amount of questions about the feature you're trying to build. You may be able to tailor this somehow to act as the opposing counsel and have it poke holes in your argument. I suppose the closest analog would be a sparring partner.

Its helpful for me and my ADHD brain because I can go down all sorts of rabbit holes and it can easily keep track of all the ideas i have while grilling and it can send sub-agents out to investigate other claims to add more context to the grilling session.

I’d disagree with this being targeted toward normies. Reread the release. The first demographic in their copy is toward developers:

“ Turn feedback into tested fixes You’re a developer working on an app. Your dot watches customer feedback for recurring requests, scopes smaller improvements and bugfixes, builds and tests them, and brings you complete PRs to review with attached videos showing the changes.”

theres a popular thread on claudecode or claudai subreddit that proves 20x isnt really 20x. apparently its a marketing gimmick and the recommended solution is two 5x plans > 20x at greater than half the cost of the 20x

this is awesome. can you open source it so i can fork it and add some enhancements like exposure/contrast adjustments etc?

Its mostly used with Codex so you can give finer control over task delegation.

its definitely worth learning the different strengths and weaknesses for each one and which you should use for planning/building/testing/documentation updates etc.

No point in burning excessive tokens using a high tier/expensive reasoning model like Sol/Xhigh if just updating a readme file.

That’s an interesting point and we have not really had a reliable dataset to qualify individuals as “professional gamer/streamer” vs a hobbyist.

Their content publication history should be a good metric for establishing our future subjects and departed ones as engaging in above average gameplay for each specific genre.

I’ve always found it fascinating that I could recall essentially turn by turn navigation of WoW classic routes in which I spent countless hours. I’ve always thought about trying the memory palace technique and using those routes which would probably work well.

agree with all the above. i usually throw on brown noise/moving water youtube videos since the frequencies cancel out most distracting noises. one of my fav ambient music channels is obsidian soundfields on youtube.

another trick recommended by Huberman is wearing a hoodie and reading in front of a blank wall. this will will restrict your visual field and not get distracted by passing cars, light reflections, etc.

i think the biggest "trick" to follow through with reading is the screening process at the outset. ask yourself - why do i want to read this? what do i hope to learn from it/get out of it/etc? am i reading it just because other people are talking about it? answering some of these questions should help you follow through when you 'get stuck' or lose interest, which you can then review the initial reasons why you picked it up in the first place. should also make it easier to put down/ DNF

probably not. the engineers dont even know how these things work (see: black box) so how could you even prove that its not doing what it's 'supposed' to be doing?

so not only are the sycophantic, hallucinatory, but now they're also proven to be schizophrenic.

neato.

yeah but see the problem with abba is i just wanna get up and dance and not do any work