m_w_
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
I’m all for recreating software, especially to be faster, cleaner, smaller, and more bespoke - but trying to one-shot a whole suite will never work. Building these foundational office-y tools requires an immense amount of testing and attention.
OpenRouter is not remotely close to a representative source for inference distribution.
It would be interesting to see the reverse, how long does each model take to get >50% WR against bots of various tiers.
Fwiw, what it's trying to replace (GitKraken) is slow, clunky, and resource hungry, so it's not hard to beat.
The lights are generally not reliable on the 949 - particularly the radar display on the front-left (vumeter per channel, basically), so that’s also worth a service, if you can.
After that it’s the caps, as you probably know. The thing is with the quad ones, there’s literally two of everything in there.
Best of luck with restoring and selling it.
Listing “5” for an email address, and then "4" for DNS and "6" for a gender much later in the article is perfectly emblematic of all the nonsensical decisions therein.
[1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/349797/u...
Yeah, you said it. I've also got a QX-949, but luckily no vintage refrigerators.
As much as the over-built, last-a-lifetime quality is a big component of owning of these old appliances, I can imagine how that fades when it's an object that weighs 800 pounds instead of 80.
Pretty insane. I suppose it lends further credence to the idea that anything that can be shown to be correct can be done by a model.