Recent submissions

Comment · 12 days ago
I'm sure that hunger has been a bigger problem in Africa and India than it has been in any socialist state in our lifetimes.
Comment · 13 days ago
Good ole mass-starvation for the majority that can't find work that appeases the ownership class? It's a unique value-system I suppose.
Comment · 26 days ago
Nah it never catches on because of a combination of momentum, esoterica, being more difficult to learn due to having more discrete functions in the stl. And then there is the fact that it's pretty dated, so lots of people come to CL, get mad about it's warts and then become compiler writers.

I say this as somebody that loves CL dearly. The difference between princ, prin1 and print; set, setf and setq; =, eq, eql, equal and equalp is more than most programmers can be bothered to memorize.

Comment · 29 days ago
At that point, the machines correctness doesn't need to be evaluated by humans, it just needs to provide a recipe for how to achieve some process.
Comment · 1 month ago
It's a bit more circular than that. The music you were raised with sounds good to you, which means you want to understand how to make music like that hence the dominance of 12 tones and major and minor scales in Western music.

But also, nobody bothers to talk about this because for beginners without sufficient focus on mastery by copying other people, they're generally not going to be able to do anything notable with music anyway, so this kind of meta-theory is an unnecessary distraction. (And by the time you are actually decent with music literally years have passed and you've probably stumbled upon this idea by then)

Comment · 1 month ago
> we tolerate them being slightly out of tune

And in many cases we don't need to tolerate this because most instruments barring guitar and piano allow musicians to tune chords to just temperament, and players will do this automatically and completely subconsciously.

Comment · 2 months ago
Probably just turn off the jammer for 2 seconds
Comment · 2 months ago
Given that the purpose of a measure is to make predictions: IQ can be used to improve predictions of academic outcomes, whereas the multiple intelligences models are worse at this.

Whether or not there are multiple intelligences or not is an implementation detail unless knowledge of this has measurably lead to some better prediction.

Comment · 2 months ago
It's telling how out of touch the evaluators of these things are that the grand winner designed a tool that's been in use by fire services for decades. (Software that predicts fires based on lightening strikes). But you slap LLM on it, and assert that somehow you can replace the arborists and helicopter pilots with drones (as if the human piloting the thing is the expensive part of a multi million dollar vehicle hauling tonnes of water around anyway) and that tricks non-professionals into thinking you're disrupting a field.
Comment · 3 months ago
Congratulations, I'm sure it was a monumental effort to build this. Good luck with marketing and all that.
Comment · 3 months ago
> Not as a stand in for general stupidity.

It's being used as a stand in for a very specific example of stupidity, and it is "clever" because it evokes strong imagery in an unexpected way. Which is why it is funny. But still offensive. It's best to avoid black and white thinking about things like this, as hard as it is for the ego to admit that it takes pleasure from cruelty.

Comment · 3 months ago
I assume you're being sarcastic, but moron, retard, stupid, dumb, idiot, mad, imbecile, mongoloid, spastic, lame, lunatic, maniac and psycho were all used as medical terms before they became stigmatic. Filter out sexual and scatological insults and there is very little left.
Comment · 3 months ago
Most of our insults against intelligence come from medical terminology originally. Every word eventually starts being used offensively, and then a new one gets coined and the cycle continues.
Comment · 3 months ago
It is, and autism is just the swap-in vulnerable minority of the day that is socially acceptable to be the butt of the joke.

If you don't understand what I mean, swap out "autistic" for "retarded" and the joke still functions, but a lot more people will be offended by it.

I still laughed though.

Comment · 3 months ago
Governments have been working on this for more then 20 years now. 40 maybe. As long as I've been alive at least. It's just that all of the actions to try and deal with this have been continuously undermined by fossil fuel industries and right-wing politics.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton