lucd
Joined 11 years ago
Karma
251
Submissions
85
Member since
May 11
Recent submissions
Comment · 3 months ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Kind of ironic reading this and then finding https://github.com/customer-stories/nytimes, huh?
Wonder how GitHub wasn't able to detect a single token downloading the entire organization's worth of repositories, especially if it's over 6 thousand of them. Surely that's not something that's done regularly? Seems like a pretty massive oversight if anyone can just grab a token and get themselves a full copy of the organization.
Comment · 3 years ago
"Persons who received the BA.5-containing bivalent booster had better neutralizing activity against all Omicron subvariants (especially against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB) than those who received 1 or 2 monovalent [original] boosters"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2214293
Comment · 3 years ago
I'm not sure I understand you.. Do you deplore that Sinovac and Sputnik aren't available in Australia? Really?
Comment · 4 years ago
Only purpose of this kind of initiative is to cause trouble.. Marketed by the same trolls who spread medical disinfo, climate negationism, Russian propaganda..
Comment · 4 years ago
What eliminates social cohesion and trust is
* the disease itself
* the people instrumentalizing the disease and/or the sanitary measures to partisan ends..
Comment · 4 years ago
If there was such obvious nefarious and severe effects, pharmacovigilance would have seen it.
Malone is one of the worst disinformer https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-m...
Comment · 4 years ago
The vaccine antigen is only a small part of the virus. Furthermore is was modified and is inert.
https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behi...
Because of international pharmacovigilance we know that ARNm vaccine induce some myocarditis and pericarditis, at a much lower rate than the virus and less severe.
Comment · 5 years ago
Not peer reviewed, not published, anonymous authors.
This is a fake meta-analysis.
The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
Comment · 5 years ago
Nowhere in the paper I read that ADE was detected in the vaccined. Vaccine-induced ADE is only evocated as a possibility.
That's a letter to the editor.. That's an expert opinion and sits at the bottom of the hierachy of scientific evidence.
Furthermore authors seem to be connected to Raoult..
Comment · 5 years ago
Tess Lawrie co-wrote a meta-analysis that was crowd-funded, on the premises that ivermectin is working against covid.. That doesn't bode well for its neutrality, does it ?
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-us-get-lifesaving-drug-appro...
Comment · 5 years ago
Tess Lawrie ? The same Tess Lawrie who wrote a fraudulent pharmacovigilance analysis claiming that covid vaccines are unsafe, based on the arbitrary claim that anything bad happening to vaccinated people can only be caused by the vaccine. An old anti-vaccine trick.
Comment · 5 years ago
Insufficient scientific data, no rationale
After chloroquine, same kind of fallacies are used to push ivermectine..
"Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures. However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans." https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the...
Comment · 5 years ago
Here is some chart showing vaccination effect on hospitalization for severe forms. Very telling.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/israel-severe-hospitaliza...
Comment · 5 years ago
The 94% effectiveness isonly reached one week after the second shot. Only 27% got the two shots. Also Israël recently got the UK strain which is far more transmissible.
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/nasdaq-che...