lucacasonato

Joined 7 years ago

Karma
1,189
Submissions
190
Member since
Jul 11
Software person. Deno core team. Member of TC39. he/him

Website: https://lcas.dev Email: [email protected] Twitter: @lcasdev Github: https://github.com/lucacasonato

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 9 months ago
It will only replace the secret in headers
Comment · 9 months ago
We honestly should have just linked to oracle.com instead of evil.com
Comment · 9 months ago
It’s a cloud service - so you can call out to it from anywhere you want. Just don’t ship your credentials in the app itself, and instead authenticate via a server you control.
Comment · 9 months ago
We run or own infrastructure for this (and everything else). The link was just an illustrative example
Comment · 9 months ago
I can confirm Ryan is a real human :)
Comment · 9 months ago
We'll increase the lifetime in the next weeks - just some tech internally that needs to be adjusted first.
Comment · 1 year ago
Happy to answer any questions :)
Comment · 1 year ago
Deno is NPM compatible
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
You clearly have not read the post :D
Comment · 2 years ago
It is practically abandoned, but unless the USPTO or a US court says that that is so, it is not legally abandoned. That is a problem because the confusion and insecurity about the trademark remains until it is legally considered abandoned.

That's why we need to file a petition with the US Patent and Trademark office.

Comment · 2 years ago
like 90% of the DMA is just this haha
Comment · 2 years ago
Except that is not what Google is doing. They have exclusive access to the one line that is preinstalled for all houses. Only they can use it. And if you want a different provider, you can't use that same line. You have to pay for the installation of a line from that provider with your own cash.
Comment · 2 years ago
I agree it is very useful! This is also how I discovered this in the first place.

But that is not at all my point. The point is that google.com web properties have access to an API and a browser capability that is not available to it's competitors. Google only allows reading CPU info for itself.

The reason the data is not available for everyone, is because it would be a huge tracking vector. Same reason we don't allow webpages to read the device hostname, or username, or Chrome profile name. Google exposes this to google.com because it trusts itself. That poses this antitrust issue though.

Comment · 2 years ago
No, this is used by Google Meet right now. Open the "Troubleshooting" panel in meet.google.com in Chrome, and you'll see live system wide CPU usage reporting :)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton