ltwdm

I don't understand what is Europe-specific in those examples. Curious if it is any less awkward in any other culture?

FWIW If you know the number, you can use the web URL ws.me/<phone_number_with_country_code> to initiate a chat even if the contact is not saved/without granting contact access

I'm sorry I still doesn't get it, it would be helpful to provide a couple of bullet points

I have doubts about the authors intentions: Look up the wikipedia article and in the past he has done things of questionable integrity to be popular. He is a good storyteller and there is strong criticism from the medical professionals about his skewed views about ineffectiveness of current treatment methods. He does not cite enough references for such a hevayweight topic. I have no problem in him presenting a new perspective, but this is more of getting into the bestseller book list by telling you what you wish to hear.

I am curious why "human compatible" patterns would be only found in primates etc.? Aren't these about molecular mechanisms and proteins? Is it hard to translate the results to humans if some promising mechanism is found in more basic molecular level?

It is indeed a good way of looking at architecture and networking. But to me it is more of a hindsight tool or validation of things you already know, than a learning resource for someone who doesn't know details of architecture.

I agree,but isn't the article a good step towards educating the public about the nuances of these diseases? I think the spectrum is so broad, and maybe it will help the people with milder symptoms at it's tail end by making the society more receptive. I have a relative who is scheizophrenic and I can't stress how important it is to make people aware, and enable them to see from a compassionate angle. To me this article goes in the same direction as the remarkable article done years ago by Rachel Aviv [1] To me we need more like this. And also the article does mention how the researchers stress on proper diagnosis and treatment.

[1] http ://www.columbia.edu/cu/neuwrite/pubs/avivHarpers.pdf

I like that theory. Maybe much of what we associate with the word "consciousness" are the mental models which cannot exist without language, like the social aspects Yuval Noah Harari talks about.

How do you imagine the content the newsreader is supposed to read? Isn't it hard to produce random coherent content in your mind?