ltowel

Do you remember what it's already happened for? Do you know what devices they're equivalent to?

While I get the impression FDA and industry prefer 510ks as much as possible, personally I don't see how this is close enough to anything out there right now for that to pass the smell test.

My guess would be that some `Watson` equivalent stuff will be 510k'd in as part of an MRI, CT or DBT imaging system or a CAD tool working on these systems. I think it'd take a while though, I don't think the regulatory science is there yet for actually showing value.

.Net Framework, .Net Core and .Net Standard all have different version numbers, which correspond to different things. In addition, since Core and Standard are both in the 1.Xs currently, it can be confusing. Finally, the .Net Core SDK is versioned differently from the run time, both somewhere in the low 1.Xs right now.

``` >dotnet Microsoft .NET Core Shared Framework Host Version : 1.1.0 Build : 928f77c4bc3f49d892459992fb6e1d5542cb5e86 ```

``` >dotnet --version 1.0.0-preview2-1-003177 ```

The version numbers aren't necessarily weird, but the versioning sure is.

Disclaimer: MS Employee who uses Dotnet, but doesn't work on it.

Google owns VirusTotal, so they either alternatively have a strong set of tagged samples to work with, or an incentive to not disrupt their partnerships with exiting vendors.

place the 3 black pawns and 7 white pawns to add to the appropriate numbers?