Recent submissions

Comment · 17 days ago
Power lies wherever the people believe it lies, and that is something that can shift very quickly.
Comment · 2 months ago
This is why we have a court system.
Comment · 3 months ago
There's a reason the three most important things in real estate are "Location, location, location"
Comment · 3 months ago
I think it could also be used outside of making a part. For example you want to setup sensor on a surface but it's important not to damage the surface, like the outside of a boat. This would be excellent for that.
Comment · 3 months ago
His mistake was giving a passcode he knew would destroy the data on the phone. Instead leave the destruct passcode written on a scarp of paper inside your phone case.
Comment · 4 months ago
Maybe leaving it to professionals would make more sense, but the majority of people aren’t in favor of it. I’m not even in favor of it and I had a couple fireworks bursting right outside my balcony last night. I was on the balcony and a ducked, though I would have been fine if I didn’t. Maybe require a brief safety training before purchasing? I’m not sure exactly what is going to reduce stupid behavior with explosives.
Comment · 4 months ago
Doesn’t imply that the cops should be involved in prevention.
Comment · 4 months ago
Using existing parental controls parents could set their kids age and that could be used for the age controls. Could the parents let the kids around the age gate? Sure but they could do that even if a government ID and camera was required. This actually might be more effective than a lot of these systems because other adults could not let the kids use their IDs
Comment · 4 months ago
They said the extra time ment they would be able to do additional verification. I’ll bet checking what games you purchased and play time are a part of that.
Comment · 5 months ago
This decision almost certainly came about because of people thinking what action was least likely to get them fired. Any rational person would realize the odds of an actual bomb are so close to zero you would need to start worrying about the sun spontaneously exploding if you were worried there was a bomb. The problem is that if you ignored it your boss could say you ignored a bomb threat and fire you.

Also if they really thought there the plan was going to explode any moment they would have ditched in the ocean or at least diverted to the nearest airport. They didn’t because there was no danger except to their jobs.

Comment · 5 months ago
It treating every BomBeat RT-SF16 radio as if it contained a bomb would be a moronic reaction to that
Comment · 6 months ago
Yes but critically none of this money is actually given to the homeless person. So we aren't giving them anything for free we are just dealing with the consequences of them not having a proper support system. Spending money to do that is okay, because it doesn't really directly benefit the homeless person.
Comment · 6 months ago
I'd say it was bad legislation because this was a foreseeable outcome. I actually worked on cookie banners, and we did user testing, a full 80% of people closed it before reading single word and thought it was an ad.

This type of ambush agree to XYZ or you can't come in that we see with EULA's and privacy polices is unfair, just like if some scammer demanded people sign a fifty page contract before they enter the supermarket. This is something people understand intuitively.

It was foreseeable, and the end result is very little has changed as far as consumer privacy. Most people just agree to get the box to go away, if you actually want privacy your best bet is still a private browsing session and a VPN.

Comment · 6 months ago
My job was building cookie walls in response to GDPR. It might not have been the “intent” but it certainly was the consequence of that law.
Comment · 8 months ago
Just because you aren't charging money doesn't give you the ability to act as an attorney, doctor, or civil engineer.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton