lostlogin
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
Eg should the responsibility be on tobacco smokers to look after themselves, or governments to regulate/restrict/ban.
But what’s the appropriate allocation? I don’t think it’s zero. It shouldn’t be a larger percentage than their shareholding.
There are other examples. Eg someone who manufactures or sells dangerous items. Drugs, alcohol, guns.
They have some degree of liability in many jurisdictions. They aren't entirely responsible for what their products do. But are they zero percent responsible?
Their car charger was doing my head in.
I pulled it apart and found an Ethernet plug and it was a complete game changer.
But: the app and their servers remain.
Doesn’t that apply to any power source?
He was famously pro Ukraine.
Here it is: https://m.slashdot.org/story/21026
‘You can’t trust hardware’ is probably a more accurate statement.
After getting screwed around by my bank (ASB) I am looking to get away from them. Wise is tempting. They are not a bank.
My salary can go to them. Why would I need a bank for taxes or my children?
The only thing holding me back is the fact that money isn’t government guaranteed as secure with them. With ASB NZ$100k is government guaranteed.
It didn’t go that well.