llmslave3

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

There is also plenty of extremely experienced programmers saying "this stuff is useless for programming".

Why do you care so much to write a blog post? Like if it's such a big advantage, why not stay quiet and exploit it? Why not make Anti-AI blog posts to gain even more of an advantage?

One of the big red flags I see around the pro-AI side is this constant desire to promote the technology. At least the anti-ai side is reactionary.

I find it slightly ironic that Anthropic benefits from ignoring intellectual property but then tries to enforce it on their competitors.

How would they even detect that you used CC on a competitor? There's surely no ethical reason to not do it, it seems unenforceable.

I wonder what would happen if Github was flooded with a few thousand repos that looked legit but had some poison files embedded inside.

This isn't sabotaging AI research, it's sabotaging companies who scrape information indiscriminately from the internet to power their LLM-as-a-service business. AI is far more than just OpenAI and Anthropic...

Or Lua... :>

Go's type system is fine. This kind of comment is just pointless and goes against HN rules.

Probably stop using technology. Might go back to bartending tbh.