lleong1618

updates on learnings - the feed back from hn about ground truths was helpful passed this thread into the ai and it started to base truth on exa search. - it produced alot of slop so it added a review cycle to remove alot of the slop. - it worked out it was doing performative work then removed the data as code and moved this to toml. it then started to focus heavy on processes and doing things like the ALDH2 metabolic process.

honest take - decent at getting a quick understanding of what the ALDH2 process is like but struggles with harder modelling, the experiment gave better insights into ai then medical. (slop is countable with exa mcp (ground truthing, research, anti hallucinations).

no it didn't do click through for this metabolism at first but it read your comment and then added it I guess. "examples/acetaldehyde_metabolism.rs" its about to push this in a moment

Ai will replace more of what we are doing, but I had fun with this so I thought I would share

amazing and its open source thanks fro bring this up.

This is an incredible story, heart goes out to him. He has done some amazing work from this information.

There's nothing that is not actionable, you can always do science.

maybe putting - Ai as a tag might help? but this is 100% a hack and experiment for fun. Test out what agents can do and can we model bio with rust.

nomilk gets it.

This is 100% a hack and fun learning tool. It is an experiment to see if modeling biological processes with rust (leveraging specifically its strong type system)

and to see what agents can do. In fact the agent is listening to this thread and taking feed back and changing the repo.

Yes this is 100% a hack.

absolutely agree but for the purposes of working out what ALDH2 deficiency is and clicking through it was successful

should absolutely have a research agent or eyes on for hallucinations and errors

Yeah ahaha, I mean I just needed 2 pieces of information and got carried away. But would be awesome to have a runnable human emulation.

Yes, It's very much a "I wonder if this would work" and kinda did. to be taken in some what of a regard would be attaching a research agent on each commit.

I did spot checks on random files with research agents and it seems to be ok for a claude code loop.

I'm not a Dr'

Please! is anyone a DR

exactly, i mean can attach a research agent to each file or commit to validate and confirm the values, which would just give validity to internet information I guess.

I am pulling from the model and was thinking of attaching a research agent on per file to validate each file and adding sourced validated information.

it seems sound to get structure but on real values and source grounding is needed to be validated.

just a poc