llama052
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
“malicious actor had access to abliterated models and substantial compute resources which enabled them to perform highly sophisticated exploits against our infrastructure.”
They don’t provide any details but pass it off as an advanced AI attack. I’m going to just read that as what it is. A likely scapegoat for shitty security.
It can certainly get closer but unless your tech stack is a webserver and an application it can get complicated.
”An external incident response firm reviewed PingCAP’s production systems and found no evidence that the attacker ran commands or maintained persistent access in the systems reviewed”
hmm, I don't think that's true.
I find it really baffling how much they are downplaying this incident on their statement.
”An external incident response firm reviewed PingCAP’s production systems and found no evidence that the attacker ran commands or maintained persistent access in the systems reviewed”
That does not appear to be true.
Then you have real security incidents that you need to tune into constantly.
Let’s block traffic on the internet blindly just in case someone is looking at an adult website.
At a minimum you can respect their guardrails of a project they maintain.