liontwist

Interesting. If that’s the interpretation I think i need to contribute elsewhere.

I can’t trust that I’m not seeing other important perspectives here.

One of my flagged comments is “At what age would you support them?”

Many reasonable and civil comments I and others made earlier today are being flagged. Whats going on?

No. My argument is that bond defaulting is a legal status. Not a server outage. And that we are getting into larp territory with no evidence they are tampering with bonds.

Is that what the economic community is saying will happen?

Would you listen to me if you found out I had one?

I think you’re having a bad day, and I recommend taking a break.

I will not be engaging with your comments.

I dont see what evidence would be sufficient to appease you on any of these. I think you mistook an interpretive comment expressing the meaning and value of events.

I think the “middle school” comment is childish, and I think you regularly read and internalize interpretive material without the same expectation.

Well this just confirms this is hyperbole. Auditing and cutting federal agencies is not going to cause a Great Depression

Why do you think treasuries are at risk of not being paid?

- computers have outages, so I imagine they run them earlier than legally required and have procedure to detect and fix failure - computers have outages so I imagine there are legal procedures for handling issues with bond payments - if they break treasury payments trump will tell them to fuck off - this whole situation is a larp because you associated “treasury” and “bonds” in your mind and imagined that this risk exists

I’m not sure you know what SOX is.