Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Perhaps most of the impact could be burdened on NVIDIA investors, employees, leadership, or OpenAI investors, employees, leadership, etc., etc.
Comment · 1 year ago
its Vitalik what do you expect? Do you think Bernie Madoff was speaking objectively when talking to his potential clients?
Comment · 1 year ago
Escape to safety? Do you mean, have their land stolen?
Comment · 1 year ago
Yeah this is reasonable, they really shouldn’t sort kids for opportunities in early grades. Instructors shouldn’t have to focus on whether or not a kid needs more opportunity but on the kids who are falling behind; kids who are falling behind shouldn’t be treated as defects
Comment · 1 year ago
[flagged]
Comment · 1 year ago
I am dealing with family members who seriously believe this is religiously justified. And yet they’re secular Jews…
Comment · 1 year ago
Profoundly stupid article. If affirmative action "forces firms to hire less competent workers", how could one Cambodian guy who benefited from an affirmative action policy also be partially responsible for the "dominance" of Cambodian ownership in the SoCal doughnut business?

Are you seriously going to think the nepotism involved in staffing and franchising Midwestern Dunkin' Donuts is not even more beneficial to the lower intellect/conceived through fertility treatment Choate Rosemary alums who are receiving DNKN dividends? You seriously don't think Indians seeing an insanely predatory franchising opportunity as an opportunity has anything to do with an access to communal financial support? Maybe they don't need to go through an insanely predatory loan to finance their franchise!

You should be angry at the people inheriting large sums of money who are essentially doing nothing with their lives, not the communities who are being maligned in this article for allegedly cornering or forming a cartel over a doughnut market.

Comment · 1 year ago
Sorry but rifling through your weblog there is a ton of freak shit posted dog
Comment · 1 year ago
This article seems openly misogynistic. There's nothing inherently "effeminate" about refusal to work, brooding over obstacles, perhaps having principles or ethics falling in the way of becoming a quant at an HFT firm. I also feel like the term "trannyism" as used in the article just seems vacuous. What is that word trying to inspire? Just because you have the ability to be stoic for work isn't making you more valuable as an individual. Does it allow you to increase your margins? Sure. But that ethical argument has absolutely nothing to do with where someone lies on this new masculinity contest everyone seems to engage in. Just because you have a Y chromosome doesn't mean you don't have Fragile X.
Comment · 1 year ago
I'm sure the AR will do something extremely useful - perhaps draw firearms on the civilians in view.
Comment · 2 years ago
I wish there was a better solution to this crisis. There should be a corporate tax on software companies solely to fund open source efforts or something of the like.

Some open source projects have merged into one umbrella organization to better solicit sponsors but I don't think that will lead to anything fruitful, more so lead to a thing like Canonical where there's a profit motivation to the project

Comment · 2 years ago
Refocus on x86? Why would they double down on the archaic stuff?

Intel has all the opportunity to innovate and they choose not to.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton