limeyy
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
For example: MS Office used to cost 4-500 euro for the average home user a few years ago. That was ridiculous.
If you have a small shop and 2000 Facebook page likes, Facebook rips you off each time you want to reach them.
Maybe market dictates these prices but then again, they would be in the position to dictate the prices in the first place.
Just because ISIS mentions a cities name, does not really mean it makes the city less livable. This article isn't Economist worthy.
So the real question is, if they wanted to make this, what the hell took them so long?
It really smells like a mistake, and catch-up, almost pitiful at this point.
It's not that Wordpress is good, or great or that much extensible. One could easily look for ExpressionEngine or Craft, if that would be the case.
But if you want a 1-click install, plus slap a 50$ theme on it, and your stuff to look pretty good, Wordpress is a viable solution.
However, if you want to customise stuff yourself, things become really dreadful very quickly. Anyone saying otherwise, hasn't done so.
All the other stuff, about any of its "goodness" as addressed here in the article, is basically the author doesn't knowing any better, what a real CMS is supposed to do.
It has become the defacto standard. Unfortunately, because it's a big mess indeed.