lesserknowndan
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
I have been running some local models on LMStudio using an AMD 5950XT with 128 GB Ram (until recently with no GPU offloading). My two cents is that I keep reaching for my free ChatCPT account because I find the local models fairly unreliable.
Some just seem to get into a thinking loop where they go over the same ground again and again. Others can just output pure garbage.
Would anyone here suggest any specific models. Especially for Swift/SwiftUI. PHP. And MySQL Stored Procedures.
I'm assuming it didn't land there...
Are you using the wrong word?
Parenting is what parents do towards children that are _their own_. Not random people on the Internet...
Sometimes some words just don't apply to what you, yourself, are doing. And we should resist the urge to redefine words to match what we are doing. To paraphrase Brie Larson, "that word is not meant for you".
I would say that "Software Maintenance" doesn't relate to, say, web development as much as it does to other types of software because often -- especially when developing bespoke systems for clients -- there are additions based on changing business requirements.
But that said, there are activities that are best classed as "Software Maintenance". These are often changes required because of changes to software dependencies or 3rd party services. I agree with the article -- I think -- in that additional features shouldn't really be classed as maintenance.
That all said, I think the main point of Software Development vs Software Maintenance -- especially when discussing the Waterfall model of development -- is that there should be an expectation of ongoing cost after the software is initially considered finished.
Really, this article should compare enrolments across all faculties across all ivy league universities. One can't help but wonder whether Journalism degrees are seeing a much bigger drop in enrolments.
Intel have similarly named their upcoming fabrication process 18A - so if TSMC had used 14A that would have been even more confusing than naming it the same as an old Apple chip.
Luckily, in TSMC's case, the number will be going down, not up, for any future fabrication processes.