lepouet

Thanks, I will try that

The algorithm proposed me theses and I had the same feeling as you

Yes, these lectures and the interviews by Dwarkesh are really interesting, i watched most of them, anyone know another podcast in the same style I can listen to ?

EF is not really practical, the depth of the mount limit too much the movements you can make.

Yes, the quality is better, you lose the film "feeling" but everything else is so much easier...

I used to own the scan he is talking about and various epson scanner, you cannot imagine the difference, Epson is fine and you are happy with it, then you see what an Hasselblad scanner can do for the same negative and for the rest of yout life you will think that Epsons are garbage.

I "used" to own it because it had some small hardware problems and i was unable to fix it or find someone who could repair it. I bought a digital back and never did film photography since.

This is all true but consider that you are talking about b&w film and the author seems to be talking more about color, the chemistry of color film is different and this is another rabbit hole.

I can see some friends buying that.

It's not blank and the source code is ugly, what a disapointment :(

I agree, i'm a passionate photographer and i could pay good money to know that my pictures could be seen long time after my death. Maybe startups exists that do this, but they will die, i need something with enough critical mass that i can trust.

"Clients" --> Error = Not Found

:')

Even for pro photographers, i doubt my 250Mb RAW images and 2-4Gb PSD files would be great to edit on the web...

Same thing for me, 10-20% daily battery was for Gotify...

(Android, Samsung S20+)