leigh_t
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
No.
This is due to insane usage of the extract() function. Not a vulnerability with the function itself.
You can pass user-supplied input directly to plenty of other functions which have equally idiotic outcomes, it doesn't mean that they have vulnerabilities, it means the author is a liability.
I found the course pretty hard as programmer with a strong interest in crypto, but no formal CS/maths background. The coding pieces were fairly straightforward, but the maths hurt.
Can't vouch for how "good" their PHP offering is having never used it, definitely a passionate team though, I've met several of them over the years at PHP related conferences (in the UK) as the company has grown.
All I have done is link to some items that she released into the public domain on a previous occasion.
Sharing the stupidity of others is a long-lived internet tradition. It's almost adage status; be careful what you post, it may come back to haunt you later. The same is true of this, I suppose.
I don't think it's petty at all to link to publicly available information, when others have requested that information. Google-fu differs between individuals.
I do find it particularly petty that someone would go to great lengths to expose the private details of the life of a man who just wants to be left in peace.
http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Jer...
Which may or may not be out of date
http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/vis...
Which has other useful info on it.
Search for the word "weaker"
This is how the site looks to me: http://s13.postimg.org/uduowd0if/sugar.png
In my opinion this is pretty terrible. We all know the importance of first impressions (case in point, people reading my initial response).