lefty2

interesting story, but the fact that Apple and Nvidia were sueing each other doesn't seem any reason to drop all open standards. I would say they did it because of arrogance - ie. we're Apple and everything we do is better, therefore our graphics API is superior than any other

> they claim that two of those three quarters were profitable.

no they didn't. What they said was "positive adjusted operating income". The most important word there is "adjusted", ie. they are not profitable if you include all costs

Also, bear in mind the guy who wrote the article lives in the same flat as Sholto Douglas, an Anthropic researcher.

woosh

Interesting fact, you only could come third in the Olympics during the bronze age

Even GPT Images 2.0 was already the best image generator that I have tried, however it has one massive disadvantage: draconian censorship. Even rendering a gun in a scene will get flagged as "violent" and I need to create a battle scene... there's no way to do that with the censorship the way it is

The first version is already beating Rubin in the benchmarks, according to SemiAnalysis

So, Nvidia are backstopping $100B for the Ohio project, yet at the same time OpenAI are developing their Jalapeño processor, which will mean it will no longer need Nvidia GPUs for inference. That does not really make any sense to me.

Don't worry, if it escapes from the lab we can just blame it on the bats again

I understand now. Flagged means inappropiate for Hacker News. Yeah, they always flag any article that is anti-AI - even if it is well reasoned

flagged as what?

> I literally do not write code anymore.

but you are taking advantage of a subsidised service. What happens when developers are forced to pay the full price (i.e. $2000 a month instead of $200 a month)