lazy_gator
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
By de facto, I was implying that they both accomplish the same things with almost the same list of pros and cons.
Many 0-days are built of of multiple bugs. A triple letter may use bug #1 and bug #2 to get a result, but another party will use bug #1 and bug #3 to get a similar result. Back to square one with corporate/government/personal equipment getting hacked reducing overall security.
I can see compliance not being friendly to remote where pen testing would be a lot more friendly.
I know security is a big field, but I would love to hear any insight that you have on it.
I wonder if it is compatible with node js frameworks like express. I think that node has a lot of native code to implement various functions, so it would probably require a lot of work.
The 0-day you were not reporting gave you escalated access to iOS devices. If Apple had given you a backdoor, you would have had the exact same access to the device.
Not saying its the same thing, which is why I used "de facto". The government just wants the access. Regardless the hole is intentional or unintentional, if a hole exists, then overall security is weakened